Close Menu
InclusiFund
    What's Hot

    Crypto Firms Race to ‘Quantum-Proof’ Wallets Before Bitcoin, Ethereum Networks Catch Up

    May 10, 2026

    SASSA SRD payment dates and status checks for May 2026

    May 10, 2026

    Tensor G6 may boost the Google Pixel 11, but it still won’t catch flagship rivals

    May 10, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    InclusiFund
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Home
    • Daily Brief
    • Dealflow Dashboard
    • Sectors
      • Agritech
      • Climate Tech
      • Fintech
      • Healthtech
      • Logistics
      • Mobility
      • SaaS / Enterprise
    • Tools
    • Reports
    • Opinion
    • Services
      • For Investors
      • For Founders
    • About Us
    • More
      • Disclaimer
      • Advertise With Us
      • Newsletter
      • Work With Us
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact Us
      • About Us
    InclusiFund
    Home»Tech»Tax: e-Hailing drivers accuse inDrive of double taxation, reject FG’s 7.5% VAT
    Tech

    Tax: e-Hailing drivers accuse inDrive of double taxation, reject FG’s 7.5% VAT

    ElanBy ElanJanuary 2, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Tax: e-Hailing drivers accuse inDrive of double taxation, reject FG’s 7.5% VAT
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    e-Hailing drivers operating on the inDrive platform have accused the company of charging them twice for Value Added Tax (VAT). According to the drivers who shared their trip narration with Technext, on January 1, they discovered that the company included a 7.5 per cent VAT as part of the deductibles on a trip.

    Then another 7.5 per cent VAT on their commission was deducted, a situation which amounted to double taxation. According to the drivers,

    “Immediately we entered into the new year, on the first trip I took, I was wondering why I was paying so much as commission to inDrive. When I checked the narration, I discovered that they had included VAT of 7.5 per cent twice,” one driver said.

    VAT: e-Hailing drivers accuse inDrive of double taxation, reject FG's 7.5% VAT

    According to the new trip narration, a VAT of 7.5 per cent is now applied to every trip against the driver for providing transportation services. Then there is another 7.5 per cent that inDrive shows as VAT on service payment, and service payment is supposed to be their own commission, which they are taking from the drivers.

    See also: New tax regime: Are bank transfer descriptions that important? Experts don’t think so

    According to the drivers, the service payment VAT is supposed to be for the service that inDrive is providing, since they are claiming that they are not a transport company. Thus, the service payment VAT is supposed to be paid by inDrive for the service for which they received their commission. However, the company has passed the charges to the drivers, a situation the drivers describe as unacceptable.

    “Government is supposed to charge inDrive 7.5 per cent on the service they are providing for the drivers. So they are supposed to pay that money from the commission they received from the drivers. For instance, if inDrive is taking 9.99 per cent commission from the driver, if the government wants to levy VAT against inDrive, they are supposed to levy that VAT on the 9.99 per cent commission they receive from providing service from the driver, not now taking another 7.5 per cent on the cost of the fare,” the drivers explained.

    Moove brutally scolds driver who picked rides on inDrive amid ride shortage on UberMoove brutally scolds driver who picked rides on inDrive amid ride shortage on Uber
    Drivers

    The drivers also accused the e-hailing company of raising its commission from 9,99 per cent to 12.5 per cent. This means its overall deductible per trip has now risen to 20 per cent, comprising a commission of 12.5 per cent and VAT of 7.5 per cent levied against the driver for the service provided.

    AUATON rejects FG’s 7.5% VAT

    In the same vein, the Amalgamated Union of app-based Transporters of Nigeria (AUATON) have rejected the 7.5 per cent VAT imposed on members, describing it as discriminatory and unjustifiable. In a statement sent to Technext, the union said the government appeared to have singled out e-hailing operators for VAT payment, as other transport workers are not required to pay the tax.

    “We want to call on the federal government that levying a VAT against our members for providing online transportation service is unjustifiable and unfair because other transporters operating on the street, garage, and car parks are not levied with VAT for rendering the same service, which is exempted by the new tax administration,” the union’s statement reads.

    May 1: 5,000 Lagos drivers to shutdown inDrive, Bolt, Uber in protestMay 1: 5,000 Lagos drivers to shutdown inDrive, Bolt, Uber in protest
    AUATON

    The union further said that the 7.5% VAT tax levied against e-hailing transportation services is adding an unnecessary burden to their earning, which invariably affects their purchasing power and standard of living.

    “It is for this reason that the union and members reject any transportation service VAT that singles out e-hailing drivers. It’s important that the tax administrator engage the union and the app companies to have a clearer understanding of our sector, rather than engaging a section of the app companies to implement this burdensome scheme,” the union’s statement reads.

    accuse Double drivers eHailing FGs inDrive reject Tax taxation VAT
    Elan
    • Website

    Related Posts

    SASSA SRD payment dates and status checks for May 2026

    May 10, 2026

    4 things First Bank’s 2025 results reveal about Nigeria’s competitive fintech landscape

    May 9, 2026

    How Ojamaker is Powering Instant Online Stores in Africa with AI

    May 8, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Economy News
    Crypto

    Crypto Firms Race to ‘Quantum-Proof’ Wallets Before Bitcoin, Ethereum Networks Catch Up

    By ElanMay 10, 20260

    In brief Firms are building quantum-resistant wallets ahead of blockchain upgrades. Approaches range from MPC…

    SASSA SRD payment dates and status checks for May 2026

    May 10, 2026

    Tensor G6 may boost the Google Pixel 11, but it still won’t catch flagship rivals

    May 10, 2026
    Top Trending
    Crypto

    Crypto Firms Race to ‘Quantum-Proof’ Wallets Before Bitcoin, Ethereum Networks Catch Up

    By ElanMay 10, 20260

    In brief Firms are building quantum-resistant wallets ahead of blockchain upgrades. Approaches…

    Tech

    SASSA SRD payment dates and status checks for May 2026

    By ElanMay 10, 20260

    If you receive the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) Social Relief…

    Tools

    Tensor G6 may boost the Google Pixel 11, but it still won’t catch flagship rivals

    By ElanMay 10, 20260

    Joe Maring / Android AuthorityThe latest Tensor G6 leak is good and…

    Your source for comprehensive insights on Africa’s private credit markets, InclusiFund synthesizes deal pipelines, repayment patterns, collateral trends, and sector-level signals to guide investors in underwriting and structuring credit in emerging African markets.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    our Categories
    • Work With Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Work With Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2025 Inclusifund. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.